May 04, 2009

Reinventing Our Schools

oldschoolblgThere is much angst among politicians, educators, parents, and communities caught up in the debate and rhetoric surrounding how to “fix” our education system. While most agree the system is broken, there are different viewpoints, from the extremes on the ends to all the points in between.  Yet most efforts and ideas are futile given that—to use a tired but appropriate analogy—we are trying to remodel the school house by merely painting the rooms—while the foundation is shaky, the building inspector is hovering, and the repair budget is shrinking fast.  Without a clear and overriding vision for an educated society, led by those who have the most power, knowledge, and influence, the schoolhouse will continue to crumble.  The largest, most immediate as well as on going, beneficiary of such a vision are the children—who for the most part do not have a voice in the discussion.  But they tell us in other ways-by spacing out, dropping out, copping out-that schools are becoming irrelevant to them.  The fall out is seen all around us and pundits and others are circling like vultures.

How do we remodel this house?  How do we move from making only technical changes to adaptive changes?  We adopt the platform of “re”- a prefix meaning “back” or “backward” to indicate withdrawal or backward motion.  We back away from what the dark, narrow rooms—indeed the entire structure--the education system has been locked into via bad policy, lack of coherence, and entrenchment in past-their-time practices that do not work today.  Schools are but one component in a complex, organized society and we must acknowledge it loud and clear to connect the dots literally and figuratively.

This new platform is based on the hard work it will take to:

Re-frame the dialogue. What are our beliefs about the value of children in our society? Shouldn’t our value of education in a democratic society be such that we believe that every child, anywhere is worth our every effort? We must work to remodel this house so that innovative ideas are all inclusive, with not one child left out because of their place or circumstances of birth. We must remodel the system comprehensively, not just for some children but for all children.  All children deserve great schools and all schools should have the opportunity to be great.

Re-align the mindsets. We must absolutely rid our society of mindsets that distract us from and distort our vision.  Words and labels attached to schools and children such as “failing” are particularly destructive.  If schools are a microcosm of society, then it not schools that are failing-- it is us. Comparing students from different schools, even within the same disadvantaged neighborhoods, is difficult to do in a rigorous, scientific way.  So we must stop comparing schools and ensure that every school has what it needs for each child to succeed from where they start.  Poverty and race play a huge role in the collective mindset of society and we must fully acknowledge and pledge to do all possible to overturn their negative impact on children and learning.

Re-invent assessment.  How do we define “student achievement”? How do we define “success” when we measure schools, teachers', and students performance? Currently it is defined by one test score given once a year by paper and pencil.  Adequate? Not hardly. Punitive? Yes, in many deep, and harmful ways.  If we value every child, we must assure that every child has the time and resources to succeed at the highest levels.  This can only be measured by using authentic performance assessment methods.  Will this be difficult and expensive? Yes but vitally necessary. All tightly held beliefs such as grades, time, and structure need to challenged and put into perspective based on 21st century needs.

Re-design schools, classrooms, education system. Funding a new system to make it equitable-- and takes into account that schools from poor areas will cost much, much more than current levels-- will take political and societal will, courage, and most importantly, acknowledgement that no evidence exists that there is an educational panacea for social inequality.  Children need a strong community support structure that includes resources for their parents to live a life of dignity—health care, sustainable salary, good education, and reasonable prospect for good retirement.  This requires a comprehensive effort, with all segments working together, not finger pointing or assigning blame for different parts of the whole.  It will take listening to different points of view that may not be like your own, coming together with reasoned debate and common sense solutions.

Re-energize the teaching professionTeaching is not rocket science—it is far more complex and demanding work than rocket science. It requires deep knowledge and experience in child and adolescent psychology, brain research as it applies to effective learning strategies for children with diverse needs, and working well within a professional learning community that collaborates and grows with experience and learning. Yet, somehow the pubic at large believes that anyone can be a teacher with only the desire and an entree-regardless of experience or training.  Systemic transformation is needed to prepare and mentor teachers, to place the best where they are needed most, and to reward those professionals at a level commiserate with their status-not based on what is mostly out of their control.  In spite of what we see in the movies, there are no miracles.  We need to nurture motivated, energetic teachers and give them the freedom to create learning environments where students thrive because they are given the opportunity to care about what they are doing—learning for learning's sake.

Re-new relationships that have been sacrificed in the quest for “accountability”.  Relationships between teachers and parents, learners and teachers, communities and schools.  The testing mania has pitted these groups against each other rather than working together.  Only until all are invited to the table, their ideas and roles respected, can we move forward.  “Out of many, One.”

I began my career over 30 years ago in the small neighborhood school that I attended as a child.  It had changed a lot by the time I landed there as a teacher to include children from “State Park”, a low income park, mostly African-American.  Being from the typical demographic for a teacher (still true today)—female, young, white, raised in middle class home—imagine my shock when I took a student home one day to the shack he lived in with his elderly, frail grandmother-no heat, no air, no books, no hope.  It changed me forever.  I took to heart the words of a wise, veteran teacher who mentored me my first few years—those who are least loveable, need it the most.

It is with this conviction that I push for the urgent need to reinvent education—who knows that the cure for cancer does not already reside in a child from the “corridor of shame”, waiting for the nurturance and quality education needed to bring it to the world?

February 18, 2009

Toxic Grading Practices

I am venturing off my usual---although sparse--blog post topics to talk about a personal dilemma I have had over my son's years at Chapin High School.  A little background--My third son grew up sooner than I had hoped for given he had two older brothers to lead the way. He crawled out of his crib and came down the stairs belly side down at the age of six months, was walking at nine months.  He started preschool at age three and-- because the law for how old you must be to enter first grade changed the year he was born and he is a September baby--stayed in kindergarten for two years.  He was selected for the gifted and talented program in second grade and remained there throughout elementary and middle school.  In fact, he was on the honor roll thru eighth grade and was selected as a Duke TIP scholar. 

Then high school happened-- and the bottom fell out so to speak.  He was in put Honors classes and struggled.  I encouraged him to join a pre-engineering class in ninth grade because his talents were in mathematics and science.  The teacher flunked him because he did not turn in his work.  (Luckily that teacher retired the next year.  The designer of the program would have been shocked and dismayed that the way this class was taught turned my son off of pursuing an engineering career.) But that was not his only bad experience.  His English teacher did the same.  Conferences were scheduled, consequences were dealt out at home, hands were wrung, fingers were pointed.  This has gone on each of his years in high school.  (What has amazed me as an educator is that at each conference, the teachers pointed their fingers at Eric--he didn't turn in the work, he didn't take advantage of enrichment class; he didn't take grades seriously, doesn't study enough, on and on.  Not one teacher or administrator for that matter said, "if he is not learning--as evidenced by the fact that he is failing my class--I need to examine my practices, strategies, and craft to figure out why. Why is it acceptable that any child makes an F in any class?"  )   Now my son has actually helped make the data look good at the school--he passed the HSAPs the first time, ditto with end-of-course tests.  So he didn't require intervention as defined by the accountability criteria.  In fact, he always seemed to "pull it out" in crunch time.  You would think that he would be a problem in class, right?  Not so. His teachers have all said he is not a discipline problem, he participates in class, a pleasant student, never tardy.  Just doesn't do his homework. Or turn in projects.  The one bright spot for him in high school has been his opportunity to play baseball.  He loves it. Given the story about his grade history, you can see the train wreck that happened a couple of months ago, right?

It seems that his failing classes stem from mostly getting all those 0's from not turning in work.  This year it caught up with him when it was ruled he was academically ineligible to play baseball.  It came down to a half semester course he failed because he did not turn in a PowerPoint project.  Regardless that he had a 90 average. Regardless that he made a 91 on the semester exam.  The project was not turned in--0.  He is struggling with Physics and English but he is working to bring those up.  No can do with the flunked class-- says his teacher and supported by the administration.  As a parent, I feel badly that he hasn't played the game of school well enough to be at least half way successful.  He is a bright child that has had the motivation sucked out of him from bad experiences at high school. Yet he goes everyday and even goes to baseball games as a manager of sorts although he can't play.  I have not ever wanted him to get a free ride for not doing his work.  But as an educator, I can't help but think someone at his school could have tried to look past the grades in the gradebook to see what was happening.  As a parent, I constantly wonder what I should have, could have done differently to avoid this situation.   He has not been in any trouble with drugs, drinking, smoking, never gotten a speeding ticket, is always where he says he is, comes home by curfew, a model son.  What lesson does the school think its giving him by not letting him make up the work because the semester is over and the grade is "final"?  Probably not the one they think.

My consolation is that after May, hopefully high school will be behind him.  High school grades only serve to determine the next "level" of school--and if a child has not been successful in school, why would they choose to bring on more pain upon themselves?  My son was hoping to play baseball for a college next year but that dream has been blown away by a rigid one size fits all grading system that doesn't make exceptions.  And this in one of the "best" districts in the state. It makes me shudder to think about these kinds of kids in less than stellar school districts.   And we wonder why so many kids drop out.  My son is going to be fine no matter the outcome this year.  I believe he has a good heart, a good foundation and will make good choices about his future.  Said like a mom, right?!

When I saw this video, I thought YES! This expresses my sentiments exactly--as a parent and an educator.  Are you paying attention high school teachers and administrators?

 

 

February 04, 2009

Patting Myself on the Back

Bill Gaskins sent a tweet the other day alerting me that I was quoted in an issue of ISTE's Leading and Learning journal. What a surprise! In trying to access the article, I was reminded that my membership to ISTE had lapsed so I rejoined--which I needed to do anyway.  The quote was from a comment I made on Will Richardson's blog a while back. 

If Bill had not sent me the head's up, I would not have seen it! Thanks Bill!   (I am sure ISTE thanks you too since they received my $$ for another year!) Another great example of the power of social media.

It does bring up another issue though.  A good friend who is a media literacy expert has asked,  "If they lifted it from a blog, are they required to contact you for permission to publish?"  I was not contacted yet there it is in print.  Your thoughts?

Look Inside >>
February 2009

January 26, 2009

Camp 2.0

Here's a great spinoff of the famous camp letter to parents.  It's a good look at what digital learners should be doing do not just at camp, but in the classroom.

 

A little blurry but you get the picture. :) Thanks to Scott Schwister for the heads up.

 

January 19, 2009

Top Ten List of Myths to Bust in 2009

Bill Gaskins from the Lowcountry blog Blogging on the Bay  tagged me for a meme started by Paul C at Quoteflections on the topic: Life is One Big Top Ten (2008), an outgrowth of Time's ultimate Top Ten Everything of 2008.  I have listed, in my opinion, the top ten myths in education, in no particular order. (There are plenty more so add them in the comment section.)  Let's bust these myths in 2009!

Top Ten Myths in Education

  • Grouping students by age into grades for twelve years at 180 days per year is a reasonable and successful way to organize schools.
  • Getting A's is the point of school.
  • Filtering all the "bad stuff" from children while they are online in school promotes Internet safety and media literacy.
  • Paying teachers based on students' test scores, will motivate them to work harder and be better teachers.
  • Homework teaches  independence and good work habits, "reinforces" what has been taught, and helps students to become more successful learners.
  • High stakes testing provides an accurate measurement of "achievement". 
  • Interactive whiteboards  are a school district's  best investment of funds to move classrooms out of the Industrial Age model.
  • When the money follows the child, all children will benefit--particularly the ones living in small, rural, poor school districts.
  • Its all the parent's fault.  No wait, its all the teacher's fault.  No wait it's all the policy makers fault. Oh wait it must be society's fault.
  • Politicians, corporate executives, ex military brass, and others not in the classroom all know better than those in the classrooms how to "fix" education. Besides, anyone can teach, right?

January 07, 2009

We Live in Exponential Times

Here is the latest version of the wonderfully viral video "Did You Know?" by Karl Fisch.  It is a great conversation starter for how to transform education to meet the needs of digital learners.

December 19, 2008

Let's Get Political

obama-hope

  As a naive educator many years ago at the SC Department of Education, I witnessed ugly politics up close and personal.  A new superintendent had been elected and great things were expected.  However, from the inside, all I could see was the formation of a "good ole girl" clique, reminiscent of high school.   There were rumors of a hit list, folks had their computers taking away in the night, promotions based on who you knew rather than competence, watching good people get tarnished by false rumors, and other ugly events that opened my eyes to the dark side of politics.  So it is surprising to find myself, older and hopefully wiser, realizing that politics can have a bright side, that connecting with politicians, policy-makers, and others who influence how education is defined and translated can actually be a good thing.  It may be that the  President elect  is inspiring hope in even the most jaded of us.  I am trying to connect with politicians, their communication vehicles, and others in our state thru Twitter, subscribing and commenting on their blogs, and otherwise trying to engage them in conversations about the future of education and technology in our state..  It is time for all of us to get out of the echo chambers!

In the larger education blogspace, Will Richardson recently expressed his disappointment with Obam'as choice of education secretary.  My comment to Will as well as to Ira Socol  was

There are very few in any policy-making positions that know “in a personal way” that our schools don’t work. That is especially true in my state of SC where the governor sends his children to a private school and the “choice” folks are in full force–although there are not “quality” schools for poor children to go to in most of the state! In my own small way, I am making it a mission to connect with as many of our state politicians as possible through Twitter and blogging. A handful–mostly Republicans (my version of “across the aisle”?–have blogs and Twitter accounts. I have reached out to all of them–commenting on their blogs how exciting it is that they are inviting conversation. Some have even ventured to my blog to take a look. I am also encouraging all the other SC edublogosphere to do likewise. Will it have an impact? I don’t know but at least it’s a small start that gets us out of the echo chamber and making connections that hopefully will move us forward. We have a long, long way to go!

To which Will responded

Hey Shirley, Thanks for hanging around this thread. I agree about the “personal way” comment. And thanks for this strategy insight. Maybe if we ALL take up digital arms…

To that end, I have added a widget to this blog to take up "digital arms" on a national level as well.  Last week, President-Elect Obama outlined his economic recovery plan in his weekly address to the nation. His remarks included, “my economic recovery plan will launch the most sweeping effort to modernize and upgrade school buildings that this country has ever seen. We will repair broken schools, make them energy-efficient, and put new computers in our classrooms. Because to help our children compete in a 21st century economy, we need to send them to 21st century schools.” (To which I say "From his mouth to G-d's ears! "an old Yiddish saying.)

To repeat Tim Holt, 

"Now is the time for to contact Congress with your support for President-Elect Obama’s vision for our nation’s schools and request that Congress include funding for classroom technology and school broadband access in the economic recovery package. Congress is at the initial stage of drafting this legislation. It is crucial that they hear from YOU and YOUR COLLEAGUES NOW!
Now, for the first time in many years, we have a real opportunity to upgrade our schools’ broadband connectivity and bring to scale proven education technology initiatives. Moreover, a school technology investment can jump-start the economy by adding public and private sector instructional technology coaches and IT support positions and can energize the technology and telecommunications sectors.
Don’t delay telling Congress how much our schools, our students and our nation need this support."

Click on the ETAN widget to the right of this blog to get YOUR voice heard.

December 17, 2008

OMG They've Cut the Paper Budget!

This lament is heard many times in many schools over the years in most schools everywhere.  Usually it starts around February when all those test-taking skills handouts are starting to get "run off" in preparation for the state tests.  This year, it is happening much earlier with the horrendous budget crunch. In today's Greenville News, there is a story about schools not being able to  make copies in order to save money. Teachers are upset that their students won't have their own handouts.  Yet, there IS  away to end this perpetual problem.  We know there are way too many worksheets anyway. (Some elementary schools have been known to go through thousands of pieces of paper in one week when collected for student data studies I worked on!)  As Marcia Tate says, worksheets don't grow dendrites.

In fact, there is a solution that would eliminate worries about the "paper" budget.  Let's go paperless!  Well, at least as much as possible.  This budget crunch may be the push needed to begin thinking about ways that digital technology could be used in creative and resourceful ways.  Since change is both push and pull, a huge advantage would be contributing to saving the environment by using less paper.  But the biggest advantage of all would be for students--as it should be.  In Will Richardson's blog post "Get.Off.Paper",  he asks

"Does anyone think most of the kids in our classes are going to be printing a bunch of paper in their grown up worlds? If you do, fine; keep servicing the Xerox machine. But if you don’t, which I hope is most of you, are you doing as much as you can to get off paper?"

Grand vision but what does it look like?  As with many transformational changes,  it is easy to say and hard to do.  Alec Couros posted this great video on his blog, Open Thinking & Digital Pedagogy to offer a glimpse of what networked learning can look like--minimum use of paper needed.  It is a high school example but I bet we could come up with corollaries for elementary and middle school. 

 

It will take bold steps to make this scenario happen--and a major cognitive shift in thinking about learning and teaching among policy makers, teachers, administrators, and parents.  The students--not so much. They are already there.

December 16, 2008

Not On The Test

In honor of exam week at my son's high school..

 

December 12, 2008

Making New Connections to Change Old Perceptions

New Skills for a New AgeIt is a given that if schooling undergoes the major redesign needed, it must be a systemic approach.  Yet, how many times have you heard teachers and administrators say they wish a board member, legislator or other policy maker could follow them around for a day?  That those folks who make the "rules" have no idea what it is like to be a teacher?  There is a huge gap between what is rendered as policy and what happens when that policy is translated into practice.  The most glaring example is how a desire for "accountability" has greatly narrowed the curriculum, killed creativity and innovation in the classroom, and made testing the be-all-end-all measure of a child's "success".  How do we turn this tide so that educators and the students in today's classrooms are able to create, collaborate, and connect with each other in new and meaningful ways, with the technology tools available to all?  In Will Richardson's article published this month in Edutopia, he writes

Welcome to the Collaboration Age, where even the youngest among us are on the Web, tapping into what are without question some of the most transformative connecting technologies the world has ever seen. These tools are allowing us not only to mine the wisdom and experiences of the more than one billion people now online but also to connect with them to further our understanding of the global experience and do good work together. These tools are fast changing, decidedly social, and rich with powerful learning opportunities for us all, if we can figure out how to leverage their potential.

One way we can begin to leverage their potential is for educators to connect with policymakers and let them "follow them around" via Twitter.  It is a small step but one that can prove useful for all involved.  I have added legislators to the list of people I follow on Twitter and have made some connections myself.  Whatever your political views, it is important for policy makers to hear your voice and Twitter is a great way to start.  The SC legislators that use Twitter--some often, others less frequently--are Nathan Ballentine, James Smith, Anton Gunn, Dan Hamilton, and Shannon Erickson.  On the congressional level, you can follow Jim DeMint.  I have made overtures to Joel Lourie and Kathy Harvin but so far no luck.  If you know of others not listed, please add them to the comments. 

The more we can connect and converse with each other, the  more opportunities we have to transform the way we teach and learn.  Especially if the policy makers are also using the same tools we are and experiencing what it means to truly collaborate.  As Will Richardson says, "The process of collaboration begins with our willingness to share our work and our passions publicly -- a frontier that traditional schools have rarely crossed."   Let's make the bold leaps to cross that frontier.

 

Update:  On a recent blog post,  Nathan Ballentine has listed several legislators that are using social media to connect with their constituents.  Check it out and add it to your reader!

Subscribe via Email

  • Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

How The Blog Got Its Name

ClustrMap

My Delicious Tags

My Photo

Who Am I?

  • I am an educator in Chapin, SC trying to make the bold leaps myself, as well as help others, to improve teaching and learning for all students.

Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    ETAN

    Show Yourself